Medical malpractice calls are among the most challenging in personal injury intake. The caller is frequently a patient who experienced a bad medical outcome and believes someone is responsible -- but not all bad outcomes constitute malpractice. The intake agent must gather enough clinical and factual detail to let an attorney determine whether the standard of care was breached, without crossing into the territory of making legal conclusions on the call.
Unlike auto accident intake -- where liability is often clear from the police report -- malpractice requires the firm to evaluate whether expert testimony can establish that the care rendered fell below what a reasonably competent provider in the same specialty would have done under similar circumstances. That determination requires information the intake agent must know how to elicit.
Why Malpractice Intake Is Different
Three characteristics distinguish malpractice intake from other PI case types:
Expert witnesses are required to proceed
Every viable malpractice case requires a testifying expert -- a physician in the same or related specialty who can opine that the standard of care was violated and that the violation caused the injury. Without an expert willing to support the case, the firm cannot proceed regardless of how clearly negligent the treatment appears. Intake must gather sufficient clinical detail for an attorney to assess whether a case is plausible before investing in expert review.
Statutes of limitations are compressed and complex
Medical malpractice statutes of limitations are among the most complex in civil litigation. They are shorter than general PI statutes in most states (often two years from the date of injury or discovery), they include tolling provisions for minors and for cases where the negligence was concealed, and they interact with notice requirements that in some states must be satisfied months before filing. Intake must always document the date of the alleged negligence, the date the patient discovered the injury, and any subsequent treatment at the same facility.
Causation is always contested
Even when a breach of the standard of care is demonstrable, defendants routinely argue that the patient's underlying condition -- not the negligent treatment -- caused the harm. Intake must document not only what went wrong but what the patient's condition was before the alleged negligence. A patient who died after an operation may have had a pre-existing condition that made any outcome uncertain. Intake agents who understand this gather the information attorneys need to assess proximate causation.
Step 1: Identify the Type of Claim
Medical malpractice encompasses a range of specific claim types. Identifying which category applies shapes the entire rest of the intake.
Surgical Errors
Wrong-site surgery, retained instruments, anesthesia errors, perforation of adjacent structures, unnecessary surgery. Often the most compelling cases because deviation from standard is visible.
Diagnostic Failures
Missed diagnosis (cancer, stroke, MI), delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis. Causation requires showing the correct diagnosis would have changed the outcome. Timeline from first symptom to delayed diagnosis is critical.
Medication Errors
Wrong drug, wrong dose, contraindicated medication, drug interaction the prescriber should have caught. Pharmacy and prescribing physician liability may both apply.
Birth Injuries
Cerebral palsy, Erb's palsy, hypoxic brain injury from delivery errors. Often involve both OB and hospital liability. SOL may be extended for minor children. High-value cases that require specialized intake protocol.
Failure to Obtain Consent
Performing a procedure without informed consent, or without disclosing known material risks. Requires showing patient would have declined had risks been properly explained.
Hospital Negligence
Nursing errors, falls, infections from non-sterile conditions, failure to monitor. Hospital as entity may be liable separately from individual providers, especially for employee nursing staff.
Step 2: The Provider and Treatment Questions
The foundation of any malpractice intake is a clear picture of who treated the caller, what they did, and what outcome resulted. These questions should be asked in a neutral, non-leading manner -- the intake agent is gathering facts, not confirming a theory of liability.
- What type of provider was involved? (physician, surgeon, specialist, hospital, clinic, nursing home)
- What specialty? (this determines the applicable standard of care)
- What was the treatment, procedure, or condition being managed?
- When did the treatment occur? (date of the procedure or the date the condition was diagnosed or first evaluated)
- What was the expected outcome of the treatment or diagnosis?
- What actually happened? (the alleged injury or adverse outcome)
- When did the patient first notice something had gone wrong?
- Has the patient received any follow-up treatment for the injury at the same facility? (continuous treatment may toll the statute)
Critical question: Ask whether the patient has received any explanation from the provider about what went wrong, or whether they have been told nothing. A provider who acknowledged an error, a complication, or a "mistake" creates a very different case posture than one who gave no information. Document the patient's exact words about any communications they received from the provider or facility after the adverse event.
Step 3: Injury and Damages Documentation
Malpractice cases must clear a higher economic threshold than many other PI cases because of the substantial expert costs required to prosecute them. An attorney taking a malpractice case on contingency is typically committing $30,000 to $100,000+ in expert and litigation costs before trial. The damages must justify that investment.
Physical injury extent
- What specific injury did the patient sustain? (infection, additional surgery required, permanent disability, scarring, loss of function, death)
- How many additional hospitalizations or procedures resulted from the alleged negligence?
- What is the current functional status? (working, disabled, permanent impairment)
- Does the patient have ongoing medical needs related to the injury?
Economic damages
- Was the patient working at the time of the injury? (documents lost income)
- How much time was lost from work? (temporary vs permanent loss of earning capacity)
- What are the estimated additional medical costs to treat the resulting injury?
- Were there out-of-pocket costs (rehabilitation, home care, adaptive equipment) resulting from the injury?
Non-economic damages
- What is the patient's age and life expectancy? (relevant to pain and suffering calculation)
- What activities or functions has the patient lost as a result of the injury?
- Has the patient received any mental health treatment for anxiety, depression, or PTSD related to the incident?
- Are there family members whose lives have been significantly affected? (loss of consortium, dependent care needs)
Step 4: Records and Evidence
Malpractice cases live and die by the medical records. The records document what the provider did, what they saw, what they were told, and what decisions they made. Intake should ask about what records are currently in the patient's possession and how to obtain the complete record.
- Does the patient have any copies of medical records, discharge paperwork, or diagnostic test results?
- Does the patient have a written summary of what the provider told them about the treatment and outcome?
- Has the patient filed a complaint with the state medical board or the hospital's patient advocacy office?
- Has the patient sought a second opinion? What did another provider say about the treatment?
- Is the patient still receiving care at the facility where the alleged negligence occurred?
Important for causation: Ask whether the patient has had any prior treatment for the same condition at other facilities. Pre-existing conditions and prior treatment histories are the most common defense strategy in malpractice cases. The more complete the pre-existing condition picture gathered at intake, the better-prepared the firm will be to assess causation arguments before investing in expert review.
SOL Traps in Medical Malpractice
The statute of limitations in malpractice cases contains more exceptions, tolling rules, and notice requirements than virtually any other civil claim type. Intake must flag every potential SOL issue for immediate attorney review.
Discovery rule
Many states use a discovery rule that starts the limitations clock when the patient discovered or reasonably should have discovered the injury. This matters most in delayed diagnosis cases: a cancer diagnosed two years after the initial negligent failure to detect it may still be within the limitations period if the patient only recently learned of the misdiagnosis.
Continuous treatment doctrine
Most states toll the limitations period while the patient is under continuous treatment with the same provider for the same condition. A patient who continued seeing the negligent physician after the injury may have their claim extended until the treatment relationship ended. Document all subsequent treatment at the same practice.
Government entity providers
Cases involving VA hospitals, county health departments, public university hospitals, or other government-operated facilities involve notice requirements that must be satisfied far in advance of filing -- in some states, within 90 days of the alleged negligence. These cases require immediate attorney review regardless of how much time appears to remain on the standard statute.
Minor children
In most states, the limitations period does not begin to run for a minor patient until they reach the age of majority. Birth injury cases, for example, may be viable many years after the delivery. However, some states cap the total tolling period even for minors. This should always be verified by the attorney, but intake should note the patient's age and birth date.
Wrongful death malpractice
When the patient died as a result of the alleged malpractice, a separate wrongful death statute of limitations applies, which begins running from the date of death rather than the date of negligence. In many states, this is two years from death. Intake must document both the date of the alleged negligence and the date of death.
Medical Malpractice Intake Checklist
- Type of provider and specialty (physician, surgeon, hospital, clinic, nursing home)
- Date of the alleged negligent treatment or missed diagnosis
- Date the patient first noticed something had gone wrong
- Specific injury or adverse outcome sustained
- Whether the patient is still receiving ongoing treatment at the same facility
- Number of additional surgeries, hospitalizations, or procedures required
- Current functional status and whether the patient is working
- Whether the patient has any medical records in their possession
- Whether any other provider has commented on the quality of the initial treatment
- Whether the patient received any written or verbal explanation from the provider about what went wrong
- Whether the patient has filed any complaint with a state board or regulatory body
- Patient's age and current health status apart from the injury
- Whether the treating facility is government-operated (flags accelerated notice deadlines)
Medical malpractice cases are expensive to prosecute and require expert support that general PI cases do not. The intake agent who gathers complete information on every call allows the attorney to quickly assess whether the case meets the threshold for investigation, rather than spending time chasing medical records to answer basic questions that should have been answered on the first call. The documentation discipline required in malpractice intake parallels what is expected in complex personal injury litigation broadly -- experienced personal injury attorneys consistently note that case outcomes hinge on early documentation quality rather than what happens months later in litigation.
Malpractice Intake That Gets It Right the First Time
HQ Intake's specialists are trained on complex case types, including medical malpractice, product liability, and catastrophic injury. Every call is handled by agents who know what questions to ask and why they matter.
Schedule a Consultation